Hello there.

Great to see you today.

My name is Mr. Barnsley.

Thank you so much for joining me for today's lesson.

Today we're gonna be looking at the character of Dr.

Jekyll, and we are gonna be thinking, is he a sinner or is he a sufferer? Right, let's get started.

So, our outcome then, so by the end of today's lesson, you are gonna be able to write a nuanced response, about the culpability of Jekyll.

Now, there are some tricky words in that outcome there, but don't worry if you don't recognise them all, because some of them are our keywords for today.

So, four keywords in today's lesson, they are culpable.

You might recognise that from that word, culpability in our outcome, nuanced, repressed and remorseful.

Let's check what they all mean.

So, culpable is deserving of blame or being responsible for something wrong or harmful.

So, if you think back to today's outcome, you are gonna be creating a response, writing a response that will think about how deserving of blame Jekyll is.

But there was also that nuance.

We talked about a nuance response, and that's showing a fine and detailed level of understanding.

Okay, so we're gonna try and make sure we really look at the micro ideas.

We really kind of argue back and forth about what, whether Jekyll is culpable.

Two other really useful words in today's lessons are repressed and remorseful.

These are adjectives, and repressed means holding back or suppressing emotions or desires, like holding your emotions and desires inside.

And remorseful means feeling regret or guilt for something that you have done wrong.

Look out for those words and let's see if we can use them in our discussions today.

So, there are two learning cycles in today's lesson.

Firstly, we're gonna be looking at the idea that Dr.

Jekyll is repressed, so that he's been hiding his emotions, he's been suppressing his emotions.

And then we're gonna look at a learning cycle, which questions whether Dr.

Jekyll is remorseful, whether he feels guilt for the things that he has done.

Let's dive in straight away then with the repressed Dr.

Jekyll.

So, let's start with discussion then, Dr.

Jekyll is culpable.

Remember one of our key keywords.

He feels like he's responsible for the crimes of Mr. Hyde.

He does not deserve our sympathy.

What do you think? Do you think he's guilty? Do you think he deserves any sympathy? Over to you.

If you've got a partner, you can discuss this with them.

If you're working by yourself, don't worry, you can just make a few notes or think through this question to yourself.

Do you think Dr.

Jekyll is guilty? Do you think he deserves our sympathy? Pause the video, have a discuss and press Play when you are ready to continue.

Fantastic discussions that I heard some people really going back and forth.

Some of you have very, very strong opinions on this.

Absolutely well done to everyone who was actually using either quotation or ideas from the text to help justify their arguments.

That's really great to hear.

Laura, one of our Oak people says, "Of course he doesn't deserve sympathy.

"He created Hyde and he committed crimes as Hyde.

"This is straightforward, "Jekyll is completely culpable." I'm sure Laura's argument reflects some of the arguments that you might have been having.

However, I want us to discuss Laura's argument a little bit further.

It's very understandable.

I think we can all understand why Laura might feel like this.

However we could say it, it lacks a bit of nuance.

It lacks looking at some finer details.

Why do you think Laura's answer lacks a bit of nuance here? Pause the video, have a discussion or have a think and press Play when you're ready to continue.

Yes, welcome back.

I can hear some really interesting things.

I really want to shine a spotlight on those of you who said it feels like very straightforward.

She's just got one reading, one understanding.

She has her viewpoint and she is not gonna see any other arguments, against her viewpoint.

And I guess that is fine.

It's completely understandable.

But when we are doing some analytical writing, we possibly want to explore other interpretations.

So, throughout today's lesson, we are gonna spend today's lesson through discussion, through some activities, really helping Laura try and develop a more nuanced response.

Okay, let's start with an another discussion now and we are gonna discuss why did Henry Jekyll, create Mr. Hyde? I think it's really important before we decide whether or how guilty Jekyll is or how much sympathy we feel for him, that we really reflect on why, he even created this horrendously terrible creature.

So, I've selected some quotations from chapter 10.

They're appearing on the screen now.

And I want you to use these as part of your discussion.

What do you learn from these quotations? What do these tell you about Henry Jekyll? And you can even develop those discussions, even further and thinking, "Does this change whether you feel sympathy for him "or whether you blame him." But the key thing to focus on here is why did Henry Jekyll create Mr. Hyde? Pause the video, have a think and press Play when you are ready to continue.

Well, done some really nice discussions there.

And I could see people still kind of using these quotations, say, "Well, this might make me feel sorry for him," or "this might shows that he's to blame." That's great.

We're gonna continue that discussion throughout today's lesson.

But let's really think about for the moment, why did Jekyll create Hyde? So, this first quotation shows us that society was putting really high expectations, particularly on upper class men who were expected to behave in this moralistic way that was becoming of a Victorian gentleman.

And this meant that he had to hide his pleasures with an almost sense of shame.

He had to repress, that keyword, to push down, to hide his pleasures.

Society shamed him into having these certain pleasures.

And we can see from this third quotation, like this link, you might have done some work on context before.

Now this link between religion and societal expectation.

So, we know that religion played a really important part in forming this sense of Victorian morality and societal expectations.

And so Jekyll really felt that there was a link between religion and the shame that he was felt.

And this final quotation, I love this quotation, I'm gonna look at this quotation in more detail, but he feels like he really discovered the truth, about the innate duality in man.

That we have more than one side within us, that he was both honourable and respectable, but had these pleasures and desires.

But actually this caused him to really struggle.

Like knowing this and realising this about himself and about humanity was actually something he really, really struggled with.

So, let's check then, which of the quotations below suggest that Jekyll had to repress his pleasures? Is it A, that hard law of life which lies at the root of religion? Is it B, hid them with an almost morbid sense of shame? Or is it C, the high views that I had set before me? Pause the video, have a think and press Play when you're ready to continue.

Great work if you said B, let's be honest, both A and C contribute to why he has to repress his pleasures.

But it's B, that really shows that he did.

Like he did.

Like he could've let them go.

He could've said like, "I don't care what society says, "I'm just gonna be myself." But B shows us that he didn't do that.

He chose to hide his true self.

He chose to hide his pleasures with this sense of shame.

Three really great quotations on the screen there.

So, I think all useful for you to remember and potentially use in your future analysis.

Okay, but I did say to you that I was gonna share with you a little bit more about this quotation you can see on the screen.

And I love this quotation.

I think this quotation is fantastic.

It's one that I will try and use in most of my analysis, if not all.

I generally find, I feel like it can work with many different questions that I might be asked.

So, let's have a look at it.

It's really useful when we discuss first and foremost, Jekyll's motivation creating Hyde.

He says, "I have been doomed to such a dreadful shipwreck, "that man is not truly one, but truly two." So, I'm gonna give some questions and I want you to think about why is this quotation so useful for analysis? And here's some quotations and questions to help you in your thinking.

Which section of this quotation contains the most analyzable language? What language device is Stevenson using here? Which specific words are worthy of analysis? And how might this quotation be useful in adding nuance, looking at the finer details to a discussion around culpability and sympathy.

So, I think you know that big question is Jekyll culpable? Do we feel sorry for him? Like how is this quotation useful? Pause the video.

If you've got a partner to discuss with, let's do this verbally.

If you're working by yourself, then you may wish to just think through this or even make a few notes.

Press Play when you are ready to continue.

Well done.

I heard some really fantastic ideas there.

Let's start with that first question then, because I have seen this quote used many, many times and people tend to be drawn to one section over the other, but it's not always the section that I would necessarily focus on.

So, which section of this quotation, contains the most analyzable language? Well, let's first look at this idea that man is not truly one but true two.

Possibly one of the most famous quotations from the novella.

And it is really useful.

It's useful when discussing duality, okay? So, when we're talking about duality and the fact that good and evil is not this kind of, that they're not, it's not this binary that people exist on a scale, it's useful, but it's not particularly analyzable.

So, will I use this quotation in my analysis? Yeah, I'm sure I will mention it.

I'm sure I will reference it, but I'm not going to spend sentence upon sentence, pulling it apart and analysing it, because there isn't lots and lots to say about it.

In fact, this section of the the quotation is my favourite, doomed to such a dreadful shipwreck.

Because here we have a metaphor.

His life hasn't become a physical shipwreck.

And these adjectives doomed and dreadful.

They're really, really ripe for analysis.

And more importantly, they allow us to make some really interesting inferences, about why Jekyll created Hyde.

What was his motivation? So, we looked at the beginning of the lesson, Laura made this statement, which we said wasn't particularly nuanced.

I'm gonna argue if Laura looks at this quotation and use this quotation, it could help her be a little bit more nuanced, about her argument.

So pause the video, have a think.

How might this quotation help us to add nuance to Laura's argument? What might it allow us to do? Alright, pause the video, have a think and press Play when you are ready to continue.

Brilliant job there.

Loads of people.

I love the fact that people were zooming in on individual words when they were having these discussions.

That's fantastic to see.

Okay, let's have a look at some of the things you might have said.

Well, you might have said the word doomed.

The adjective doomed creates this kind of sense of inevitability.

When someone is doomed, it's almost like they can't change their path.

So, here it argues that actually this dual nature that Jekyll has learned about himself and others is beyond his control, okay? He can't help the fact that he lives in a society that expects respectability, but at the same time has these internal desires.

So, this sense of inevitability.

It also then you can go on to say, then you could argue perhaps then it means that Jekyll's experimentation was a logical result of the dual nature of man.

How can we blame him when all he's trying to do is solve this problem that is innate in humankind? That could be an argument some people might make.

It maybe then allows us to be a bit more sympathetic.

It might suggest that Jekyll isn't in complete control.

That this is something that has already been pre-decided for him because of the innate dual nature in men.

But you might question that and say, "No, Mr. Barnsley, I don't agree with that.

"He's just being really emotionally manipulative." Actually, if duality is innate in all of us, we don't all go away and commit crime.

We all don't go away and undertake these experimentations.

So, you can absolutely use this quotation to show Jekyll is sympathetic, but you might want to use it and say absolutely not.

He's just being very manipulative here.

Let's have a look at the metaphor then to doomed to such a dreadful shipwreck.

Well, the reason I really like this imagery is 'cause it reminds me of someone drowning at sea.

And this metaphorical drowning, I can now relate to Jekyll and how Jekyll feels.

For me perhaps it means he feels that the unrelenting repressive, societal expectations, these pressures on society to not allow him to be who he wants to be, make him feel like he is drowning.

He's not actually drowning of course it's a metaphor, but he's drowning in these expectations that society is placing on his shoulders.

I could also extend the idea of this metaphor by thinking about, again, Jekyll losing control, like a ship in a storm sinking, a shipwreck is a ship that has been destroyed at sea and has sunk to the bottom of the ocean.

A ship has lost control, when a ship becomes a shipwreck is lost control in a storm.

And this could suggest Jekyll has lost control.

It suggests that his pleasures are controlling him.

He's not in control, okay? When we're thinking about how culpable he is, how guilty it is, we could use this to say, maybe he wasn't in complete control.

I also thinking of kind of this extended metaphor that I've seen throughout the text.

We know that Hyde, this language, the semantic field, of weather and storms has been used to describe Hyde previously when he was hailing down a storm of blows as he attacked Caru in chapter four.

So, we could even argue that Hyde is the storm, and obviously at this point he hasn't created Hyde, but it's almost arguing that Hyde was always part of him.

Hyde was always internal to him, and it was controlling him, before the experimentation even began.

That would be a really interesting, obviously it's not an interpretation that you would say, this has definitely happened.

We'd use tentative language, say perhaps maybe might, an interesting interpretation that one way you might look at things and then kind of taking this idea further.

It's a natural disaster.

Okay, a shipwreck is a natural disaster caused by the sea, caused by the ocean.

It is terrifying, okay? The idea of being on a sinking ship must be terrifying.

But it's not the fault of humanity.

It's something natural, the sea and the ocean.

And so again, arguing that Jekyll's actions are really terrifying to us, but potentially not his fault.

Again, we'd use tentative language here.

These are only possible interpretations.

Okay, so true or false? The quotation, "Doomed to such a dreadful shipwreck implies Jekyll "was repressed." Is that true or is that false? Pause video, have a think and press Play when you're ready to continue.

Yes, you could say that is true.

Okay, it's one interpretation, but it's definitely not false.

People can definitely see this as a logical interpretation.

Let's justify it then.

Is it, A, Stevenson's use of metaphor, could imply that Jekyll felt like he was drowning in the strict moral expectations of Victorian society? Or is it, B, Stevenson's use of the ominous adjective, doomed creates a sense of inevitability, surrounding Jekyll's experimentation.

Pause the video, have a think and press play when you're ready to continue.

Yes, so this is the best way of justifying that inference.

The other is a good inference.

Okay, there nothing wrong with the second inference, but it doesn't justify the fact that Jekyll felt repressed.

Okay, the idea that he might have been drowning in the strict moral expectations of society is a really nice way of justifying why Jekyll comparing his life to a shipwreck, suggests he has been repressed by this and forced to hide the true reality of the duality of man.

Okay, we are gonna hand over to you now, pupils were asked to discuss the following statement.

Whilst Hyde's actions are abhorrent, they're awful, it is under understandable why Jekyll undertook his experimentations.

So, people have been asked to debate, do you agree with this? Laura.

We know what Laura thinks from earlier in the lesson.

She says, "Absolutely not.

"If Jekyll was right "and all humans have a dual nature, "that is not an excuse to create a monster such as Hyde." Laura has a very, very strong opinion.

You are going to create a verbal counter-argument to her.

So, here is a kind of a reminder of some things you could do to create a nuanced counter-argument.

So, as you think about how you would disagree with Laura here, try and use tentative language.

Remember that not all of those inferences that we've just discussed, everyone's gonna agree with, Laura certainly doesn't agree with them.

So, you're gonna want to use tentative language, like perhaps may or might.

You might want to offer alternative interpretations.

So, show how this quotation can show you more than one thing.

So you using phrases like however, and on the other hand.

And of course you want to support the text with textual reference.

So, more specifically for example, introduce the quotation.

I know there is one quotation that I would really want to hear you all using in your counter argument.

Okay, pause your video and you can practise giving Laura a verbal counter argument now.

Press play when you're ready to continue.

Okay, welcome back.

Great job.

I heard some, it was great to see you all using those checklists to make sure that your counter arguments were as new as as possible, right? Jun has given us a go.

Jun has has had a go at giving creating a counter argument to Laura and he said, "Perhaps Jekyll felt he had no other option "as his life had been doomed to such a dreadful shipwreck.

"He may have felt experimentations "were the only way to escape "from the repressive societal expectations." Let's check Jun's response against our criteria.

Does it use tentative language? Well, yes it does, perhaps and may.

Does he offer an alternative interpretation? No, he's got one clear argument, but he doesn't develop it any further.

Does he use support text with textual reference? He does.

He use that quote doomed to such a dreadful shipwreck.

So, can you help Jun meet all of our success criteria? Do you want to pause the video and just think, "What could Jun say? "What additional or alternative interpretations, "could Jun add to this "to kind of make his argument more persuasive?" Pauses the video.

Have a think and press Play when you're ready to continue.

Great ideas there.

Let's see what Jun said, taking all of your advice on board.

He said, "On the other hand, "the metaphor could suggest "that Jekyll had already lost control "of his internal desires, "just like a ship in a storm at sea, "arguably Jekyll had little control over his actions." Well done, Jun has now got a really well formulated counter argument.

Okay, now it's over to you then.

I want you to think about what you said to your partner if you've been working with a partner or you can just think to yourself, "How did your response meet the success criteria? "What did you do well from this list? "And is there anything "that you would like to work on next time?" Pause the video, have a bit of a reflection and press Play when you're ready to continue.

Right now we are moving on to our final learning cycle today.

And we're gonna think about Jekyll as a remorseful character.

Remember that's someone who feels guilty, who feels sorry for their actions.

So, you're gonna need your copy of the novela here.

Do you think Jekyll feels remorseful for creating Hyde? I want you to find as many quotations from the novella as you can, which can be used to argue for or against Jekyll's remorse.

I'll give you a bit of a hint.

You'll be able to find plenty from chapter 10, but I want to see if you can find some others from across novella as well.

So, pause the video, book in hand, flicking through quotations that you can either use to show that "Yes, Jekyll does feel sorry for what he's done "or no, he doesn't feel sorry, he just feels no remorse." Pause video, give us a go and press Play when you're ready to continue.

Okay, I could see people frantically working, through their books.

That's brilliant to see.

Let's have a look at some quotations, which might show Jekyll is remorseful.

So, here are some of the things that you could have seen in the chapter numbers next to them.

So, he describes himself as the chief of sinners, but the chief of sufferers also in chapter six in a letter to Utterson.

We know in chapter seven, when he's sitting at the window, he's described as looking like a disconsulate prisoner.

So, he's looking really sorry for himself, feeling very down.

He describes the creation of Hyde of being sold a slave to my original evil.

Some of you might even argue this suggests he wasn't that remorseful, but the fact he said he was a slave certainly implies that he didn't have any control.

And then Henry Jekyll times stood aghast in shock, before the acts of Edward Hyde.

Again, so really some great quotations.

I'm sure you'll have found others that shows that he was remorseful.

You might have also found plenty, particularly in chapter 10, which suggests maybe he wasn't that sorry.

He says, "My scientific discoveries have begun "to suggest the most naked possibility of such a miracle." He describing the creation of Hyde as a miracle and he says this when he turns to Hyde, it braced and delighted me like wine.

So, that adjective delighted and that similarly like wine.

He almost feels happy, drunk with happiness perhaps.

And he also describes himself as like a schoolboy.

He could spring headlong into the Sea of Liberty.

Liberty meaning freedom.

So, it made him feel youthful and free.

So, we can see here, there are plenty of quotations to argue either way that Jekyll is remorseful or that actually he's not.

But the question I want you to think about is if he is remorseful, if we argue that he is showing remorse, does that make him more sympathetic? What do you think? Pause the video, discuss or have a think to yourself and press Play when you're ready to continue.

Welcome back.

Yeah, I heard it was a little, that was a tricky one there.

Some of you quite rightly, saying, "Look, does it make me any more sympathetic for him." Great if he is remorseful, great that he regrets what he's done.

But I don't feel any more sympathetic for him.

He still committed some terrible crimes.

Others saying, "Look, if he's sorry for what he's done "and he understands what what he's done is wrong, "then maybe I do feel a bit of sorry for him, "'cause he's kind of a little bit lost control "in this situation." Interesting one and we'll continue to think about this, but well done because those having those discussions and going back and forth is really gonna help us add nuance to our arguments.

Okay, keeping that word nuance in our mind.

Then let's do another check here.

Which of our two pupils, have created the most nuanced inference about Henry Jekyll? So Jun says, "It is arguable whether a reader will feel sympathy "for Jekyll at the end of the novela.

"Whilst some may view him as a disconsolate prisoner, "trapped in his own creation.

"Others see a man whose immoral pleasures, "delighted him like wine." And Laura said, "Readers would view Jekyll "as a completely unsympathetic character.

"By the end of the novella, he is full of self-pity, "calling himself the chief of sufferers, "when in fact we know his experiments delighted him, "like wine." Pause the video.

Who is this slightly more nuanced response here? Press Play when you're ready to find out the correct answer.

Yes, I would argue Jun is slightly more nuanced here.

Laura's response is good, but she's again, being very kind of straight to the point.

This is how Jekyll will be viewed.

All readers will feel like this.

Whereas Jun is arguing saying, "Look, Jekyll can be viewed in many different ways." He can still feel the same as Laura.

He can still feel unsympathetic towards him, but he's acknowledging that people might feel slightly differently.

And that's adding nuance to the argument.

So, we've been thinking about this idea that Dr.

Jekyll is culpable for the crimes of Mr. Hyde.

He does not deserve our sympathy.

We looked at this at the beginning of the lesson.

We looked at Laura's response where she said, "Of course he doesn't deserve sympathy.

"He created Hyde, he committed crimes as Hyde.

"This is straightforward.

"Jekyll is completely culpable." Why won't you think about then? Yes, Laura is allowed to feel this way.

It makes sense.

I can totally understand Laura's point of view.

However, thinking about what we've learned in today's lesson, what can we use to help Laura add a bit of nuance to her viewpoint.

How does she need to slightly change her argument, so it feels a little bit more detailed? Pause the video, have a think and press Play when you're ready to continue.

Brilliant, well done.

I could hear really good suggestions that we could have given to Laura to help her improve her work and make it more nuanced.

Here are some of the things that you could have said that she can acknowledge that some people may see Jekyll as repressed or remorseful.

That just because she has her perspective, doesn't mean that other readers won't feel differently.

But she could also say, "Well, yes, you might think that Jekyll is repressed, "but that doesn't stop him being culpable.

"It doesn't stop him being guilty for his crimes." She could also justify why remorse does not deserve sympathy.

Just because he says he feels sorry, doesn't mean that he deserves our sympathy.

She could even question whether Jekyll is truly remorseful.

So, she could look at some of those quotations and say, "Look, you might argue he feels remorse "for what he's done, but I don't think he does." And all the while she could be using tentative language and embedded quotations, okay? So, in her original argument, she's been very straightforward.

She's not proving, she's not using any quotation from the text to prove her argument.

So, she could do these things as well to just help her argument feel a bit more nuanced.

So, we're gonna move on to then our final task of today.

And we're gonna use the paragraph outline below to formalise Laura's response.

Okay, so we're now imagining, rather than answering it verbally, she's gonna write her response down.

To what extent should a reader sympathise with Jekyll? Now, I've already filled this in for you.

So, you are gonna just write this out.

You're gonna use these ideas and you're gonna turn these into fully, fully fledged paragraphs.

So, let's look at the topic sentence.

It says, "While some readers may argue "that the repressed Jekyll's apparent remorse "for his creation of Hyde warrant sympathy, "it's arguable whether the culpable scientist "is actually deserving of this grace." So straight away, what Laura has done there is say, "Look, I know some people might feel sorry for Jekyll.

"They might think he deserves sympathy, "because they might think he's repressed, "they might think he's remorseful, "but I am gonna argue "that actually he doesn't deserve our sympathy." So she's saying, "Look, some people might think this, "but I'm gonna argue that." Much more nuanced than her just saying, Jekyll does not deserve sympathy.

What are our supporting details? Well, I'm gonna suggest we talk about that quotation, "Doomed to such a dreadful shipwreck." So we can use that to show how some people might think Jekyll was repressed.

We can talk about Victorian societal expectations, the impact of religion on society.

But at here, I'm gonna start to say, but not all men behave like Jekyll.

So, he might appear remorseful, chief of sufferers is that self-pity, disconsulate prisoner.

But I'm gonna argue that he's not remorseful, braced and delighted me like wine.

He's not sorry, he's drunk on power.

And then you need to end your paragraph with a summary of Laura's argument that Jekyll is undeserving of sympathy.

Okay, so that's what she's saying.

She's not saying he deserves sympathy.

She's saying some people might think he does, but I'm gonna tell you why he doesn't.

But she's gonna include that as part of her argument.

So, you want to finish that last sentence with a summary arguing that Jekyll does not deserve sympathy, but you're gonna do it in a sophisticated and succinct manner.

All right, you want to give yourself plenty of time to do this.

You've got the ideas on the on the screen.

You now need to turn this into a fantastic paragraph.

Pause the video, give this a go and press Play when you're ready to continue.

Okay, welcome back.

Great work that and super well done to everyone who was checking their spelling and punctuation and grammar, before they finish that paragraph there.

Great work.

Okay, for our feedback activity then, we are going to look at our response and we're gonna highlight and annotate where we have used ideas from the plan and put them into our paragraph.

So, we're gonna show that our paragraph that we've written is linked really nicely and neatly to our plan.

So, let's have a quick look then at how Laura did this.

So, this is Laura's example.

While some readers may argue that the repressed Jekyll apparent remorse for his creation of Hyde warrant sympathy, it's arguable whether the culpable scientist is actually deserving of this grace.

The metaphorical description of being doomed to such a dreadful shipwreck, underscores how societal repression, particularly strict Victorian moral codes, led Jekyll to unleash the darker Hyde.

However, not all men succumbed to such extremes, raising questions about personal responsibility.

So Laura highlighted, she acknowledges that Jekyll was repressed.

So she's gonna acknowledge that.

She discusses some context, but she dismisses the arguments against his culpability.

So she says, some people might think he was repressed, this is why they might think he was repressed.

But I am gonna dismiss this argument, 'cause Laura does not agree.

But it is so much more nuanced than her argument from the beginning of the lesson.

Over to you then now, I want you to do exactly what Laura just did.

I want you to annotate your response with parts of the plan to show that your response is linked very nicely and coherently to your plan.

Pause the video, give this a go.

Okay, fantastic work in today's lesson everybody, really, really pleased to see how hard you have all been working.

On the screen, you can see a summary of what we've covered today.

So, the idea that Jekyll makes it clear in his final statement that he was repressed by society.

So he was driven, he was forced to create Hyde.

So some readers may argue that Jekyll shows remorse in his statement, but others might disagree.

It can be argued that repression and remorse, they do not absolve Jekyll of his culpability, of his guilt.

Nuanced arguments we know should acknowledge and potentially critically dismiss different ideas and we want to use tentative language, it's really useful for expressing those nuance ideas.

If any of that is tricky, but you've done a fantastic job.

Any of that that you're not sure about, go back and watch sections of the video, before you move on to the next lesson.

Thank you so much for joining me today.

I hope you have a wonderful rest of your day, whatever you may be doing, and I hope to see you in one of our lessons soon.

Thank you very much.

Goodbye.