Hi, my name is Miss Speakman.

We're in lesson two of 14 of the Crime and Punishment unit.

And in today's lesson, we're looking at the reasons for crime.

So as I said, we're going to be looking at the reasons for crime.

But it is important for me to give you a sensitive topic warning.

So this lesson we're about to complete contains reference to mental illness and addiction.

For some people this will be a sensitive topic.

If this applies to you, you may want to do the rest of this lesson with a trusted adult nearby who can support you.

So in this lesson, we're going to be looking at Christian, Muslim or non-religious views on reasons for crime.

We specifically focusing on hatred, greed, addiction, upbringing, mental illness, opposition to unjust laws and poverty.

So we're looking at what Christians, Muslims and non-religious people would say about these reasons for crime, are they ever justifiable? To make sure that we are ready for our lesson, please, you're going to need a pen or a pencil, a piece of paper or an excise book and a different coloured pen for corrections.

You also need to make sure that you've got a clear working space.

So TV and music off, phone to one side if you're not using for lesson to minimise distractions and also making sure that your desk space is nice and clearly so you're able to work effectively.

If you need to get yourself set up at all then please pause the video now, then unpause when you are ready to learn.

Okay, so the first thing is I want to get your views first of all before we start looking at any of the material looking at new content, like definitions, quotations, any of that stuff.

I want your opinion.

spend about three minutes on this question that I've got up here on the slide.

Should everyone who steals be punished? Would you explain your answer.

There's no right or wrong answer if it's an opinion question, but a good opinion question is always backed up by an explanation, your reasons why you agree or disagree.

So you're going to pause the video, and answer this question.

Spend about three minutes on it, unpause when you're ready to move on.

Okay, the reason why I got you to have a go at this question and to think about what you think is 'cause we'll be looking at the Christian and Muslim views on poverty as a reason for crime.

Now, poverty is where you're not able to afford the basic necessities of life.

Perhaps maybe you have no enough money to buy everything you need each and every month.

Now, the UK government gives out welfare payments, which essentially them, if you don't have enough money, it's money to help you with those basic necessities.

But for some people, this still might not be enough.

Some people may be in a position where they feel they need to steal in order to get the basic necessities.

Now Christianity condemn stealing, if we read clear in the 10 commandments, it says, "Do not steal." So Christians will say no, theft is always wrong.

However, we do have this idea in Christianity where it says "So it is with faith, if it's not alone," sorry to start again.

So "So it is with faith, "if it is alone "and includes no actions, then it is dead." Essentially what this verse is saying is if you believe in God, if you say yes, I believe that there's a God and I believe in Jesus, the Son of God, etc.

And don't do anything alongside that if you've got faith, but don't show that faith by using actions, then your faith is dead, you might not well not have faith.

What's essentially saying is that there is a responsibility of Christians to look out for one another.

And so, Christians will put that faith into action by providing things like food banks for those who are living in poverty.

But they also acknowledge that there may be times where someone feels they have no other option but to steal because perhaps they're dying of hunger, etc, or they're starving.

And so in those situations, a Christian would say, look, all of those resources of thy world money, food, etc, all belongs to God ultimately, and God would want his resources to be used in a way that helps those who are in need of it most.

Some Christians may say, if someone steals because of poverty, then it may be permissible, God wouldn't want that person to suffer.

So while Christians say, it's not okay to steal there may be some allowances if someone is in poverty.

Now within Islam there is the idea of Zakah, charity.

So people are expected to give 2.

5% of their either wealth to charity every year.

Now Zakah payments are not paid if someone is underneath the nisab value.

So essentially, there is a sort of savings allowance.

If someone cannot afford to give Zakah than they receive Zakah to help make everyone equal, to distribute money out.

So Muslims would say, there shouldn't really be any need for people to be in poverty if Zakah is distributed properly, but they also acknowledge that there may be some places and some governments which don't look after their community properly, or where things still unfair.

In Islamic countries, theft is punishable by having a hand amputated.

And so Islam is very strict on that theft is wrong is against Shari'ah law, which is Islamic law.

But again, they will take into account the situation, so the pass value the item stolen, the situation it was in whether that item was cared for correctly, so was it kept safely etc.

And there may be some allowances for those who have committed a crime of theft out of need in poverty.

But of course, theft in general would be seen as wrong.

And many Muslims and many Christians would say you have to be a bit more lenient, or at the very least you have to look to why is this person in poverty in the first place and what can we do about it as people of faith.

So what I'm going to get you to do now is do some quick fire multiple choice questions.

I think there's a really good way of just testing what we've done so far.

You don't have to commit to writing down anything.

I give you a question, there are two options.

I give you a countdown of three seconds, you then either point to your screen or say the answer out loud.

I give you the correct answer.

Hopefully you get them all correct, but if you don't have all correct is a really good way of highlighting some things you're still unsure of.

So, let's have a go do some multiple choice questions and see how we get on.

Christianity condemns stealing.

Is that true or false? Three, two, one.

True, yes, it says in the 10 commandments, "Do not steal." Most Christians believe people should be in poverty.

Is that true or false? Three, two, one.

False, of course, many Christians would say actually, no one should be in poverty if was fair and equal, the wealth would be shared out.

Most Christians believe they should help those in poverty.

Is that true or false? Three, two, one.

Good, that is true.

They believe that they should be being able to help people who are in poverty by distributing out goods, materials, food, money, etc.

And this is a way of putting their faith into action.

In Islam, Zakah is used to help those in poverty.

Is that true or false? Three, two, one.

Good, that is true.

So Zakah is then distributed to those people who are in need of it.

Most Muslims believe all people who steal should be punished.

Is that true or false? Three, two, one.

Its false.

So although Shari'ah law does require you to have your hand cut off, if you have stolen, many Muslims would also take into account intentions.

And the level of proof needed for amputation of the hand for theft is actually quite high.

What we're going to move on to next is the next idea of a reason for crime, which is upbringing.

Okay, so the next reason for crime we'll be looking at is upbringing.

Now, it's often the case that children will look to parents or guardians for guidance, and it's very common for parents to raise that child with the expectations of good behaviour.

In Christianity, there is this added expectation that parents need to set an example to children that they should raise them within the faith to follow Christianity but to also be moral people.

In Islam, there is an emphasis on the extended family being involved in the raising of a child, helping them learn not only how to be a good person in general, but to follow the teachings of Islam.

Both Christianity and Islam would say that it is important for the parents, the guardians to raise that child correctly.

Otherwise it could get misinformed about behaviour and therefore could lead to crime.

However, in both Christianity and Islam, there is still this idea that once a child is old enough to understand good and bad for themselves and to learn from elsewhere, they have to essentially move away from perhaps bad behaviour that their parents, guardians have taught them.

Islam, for example, uses the example of Ibrahim.

Ibrahim disagreed with his family who were polytheists and believes that he should be following the one God of being a monotheistic, and to moved away from his family, he spoke out against his family.

So many Christians and Muslims to say, a bad upbringing doesn't necessarily mean that you are a sort of exempt from committing a crime.

So it's not a good excuse to commit crime.

Because if you're of the age where you can work out for yourself, that something right or wrong, then you are responsible for if you've committed a crime and you can't say it's because of my upbringing, you can't punish me for it.

So many Christians and many Muslims would say, upbringing, of course will be hard to get away from if you've not been raised correctly.

If you've been raised with incorrect morals, but you're still responsible, especially as an adolescent as an adult for your own actions.

So what going to do is, I'm going to do some more questions with you.

So, most Christians believe parents are responsible for raising their children properly.

Is that true or false? Three, two, one.

Good, that is true.

So most Christians say that parents are responsible for raising their children properly, giving them the right morals.

In Islam, the extended family is important for helping to raise children.

Is that true or false? Three, two, one.

Good, yeah, that is true.

The extended family is important as well in Islam for helping to raise children.

Most Christians believe those who have a poor upbringing can never be blamed for a crime.

Is that true or false? Three, two, one.

That's false, they still say that there is responsibility yourself to take on accountability for anything that you have done.

You can't just blame your parents.

In Islam, the example of Ibrahim shows that you should not always follow what your parents do.

Is that true or false? Three, two, one.

Good, that is true.

Many Muslims would say, look, Ibrahim moved away from the family when he believed they were doing something incorrectly, and therefore that's an example of perfect behaviour.

Well done if you got all those questions correct.

We're now going to move on to the idea of mental illness as a reason for crime.

There are many different types of mental illness.

And some may mean that a person can't fully understand the law and the consequences of their actions.

But there are some mental illnesses that may make it hard for someone to understand the law and as a result of this they may commit a crime and not fully understand the consequences of those actions.

So in both Christianity and Islam, they will take into account whether that person is fully in control of their actions, is there a mental illness which impedes them from understanding the law, or perhaps maybe they don't fully understand the consequences of their actions.

So for example, this isn't linked with mental illness, but gives us some idea of this idea of criminal responsibility.

The age of criminal responsibility in the UK is 10.

So essentially, anyone over the age of 10 is said to be criminally responsible for anything that they have done.

So they can therefore fully understand the consequences of their actions.

Of course, if someone has a mental illness, which means they are unable towards understand the law, they are therefore not criminally responsible, and therefore will not be punished in the same way someone without that mental illness.

So Christianity and Islam would say if someone is not in control of their actions, if they cannot understand that what they've done is wrong, then they should not be punished and they should be helped with their mental illness.

This exists too in the UK in the justice system.

If someone is found to have a mental illness which is impeded their understanding of the law, then they will not be punished in the same way someone without that mental illness, and may also then receive help for their mental illness.

What I'd like you to do is to answer the following question.

What do both Christians and Muslims believe about those who commit a crime because of mental illness? I want you spend about three minutes on this question please.

Pause the video, write down your thoughts and unpause when you're ready to go through the answers.

Okay, so here's my answer.

Both Christianity and Islam accept that if a person is no longer in control of their actions because of the mental illness, which means they can no longer understand the law, then that person is not guilty of committing a crime when they break the law.

So both Christianity and Islam would teach this and we also see this within the justice system in the UK too.

If you need to make any corrections, please do so now by pausing the video.

Okay, we're now going to move on to looking at addiction as a reason for crime.

Now, of course, when we're talking about addiction, we may be talking about something like an addiction to drugs or alcohol, we may say that someone with an addiction will have less control over what they do when they're under the influence of that addiction.

So for example, someone under the influence of drugs or alcohol may have less control over their actions.

Many people would perhaps talk about it this way, when under the influence of that thing they're addicted to, they will have less control.

But at some point during their life, they had made a choice to get involved with whatever they're addicted to.

There's in no way saying that it's their fault, 'cause many things will underlie why someone gets addicted to something.

But there has been a choice made at some point.

So for example, getting involved with our alcohol, getting involved with drugs.

Alcohol is one of the biggest causes of criminal behaviour in the UK.

And that can be done for a number of reasons, not just for those with addictions, but for those under the influence may be more likely to commit a crime because they may have less control over their own actions.

Now, of course, this idea of some element of control with someone with an addiction is going to be important to how Christians and Muslims may approach people who commit a crime because of an addiction.

Both Christianity and Islam have very clear teachings about alcohol, drugs, etc.

Christianity says, "Do not get drunk with wine "which will only ruin you, "instead be filled with the Spirit." Now in Christianity, drinking alcohol is not seen as a sin, that drunkenness for many Christians is seen as a sin and saying that instead you should be filled with the Spirit of God.

And that wine will only, like getting drunk on wine will only ruin you.

In Islam, there is a clear expectation that people should not drink alcohol at all.

Shari'ah law says that alcohol is haram which means forbidden.

And so Muslims would say it's a sin to drink alcohol.

Is intoxicant which stops you thinking about God, it takes your mind away from the most important thing.

So Islam says, "O you have believed indeed, "intoxicants are but defilement from the work of Satan, "so avoid it so that you may be successful." Since she's saying here that addiction to intoxicants, using intoxicants takes you away from being successful staying on the straight path of Islam.

So Christians and Muslims would probably most likely agree that those who commit a crime because of addiction are responsible for their action, should be punished.

But, they would both except that person will need help with dealing with that addiction.

So with Christianity and Islam will say that there is some responsibility of the community to help that person with their addiction to hopefully help them overcome that addiction.

So, what we're going to do is do some quick five questions based on what we've just done so far, to see how we are doing something.

So disappear so we can do that.

Most Christians believe drunkenness is a sin.

True or false? Three, two, one.

True, yes, most Christians believe drunkenness is a sin but not drinking itself.

In Islam, alcohol is forbidden.

Is that true or false? Three, two, one.

True, alcohol is haram which means forbidden.

Those who commit crimes because of addiction cannot be found guilty.

Is that true or false? Three, two, one.

That is false.

They have to accept within law but also Christians and Muslims also accept that person is still somewhat responsible for their actions.

Christians and Muslims believe those with addictions should be helped.

Is that true or false? Three, two, one.

Good, that's true.

Christians and Muslims would say those who have addictions should be helped to help them overcome this and to prevent them from causing any suffering based on that addiction.

Well done if you got all of those correct.

We're now going to move on to looking at greed as a reason for crime.

So greed may also be seen as a reason for crime.

When we talk about greed is an intense or selfish desire for something.

Now both Islam and Christianity teach that greed is bad.

And both religions encourage giving and helping people rather than hoarding things and selfishly desire things for yourself.

In Christianity, there's a question teaching about greed.

It says, "It's much harder for a rich person "to enter the kingdom of God "than for a camel to go through the eye of a needle." Than she's saying those people who hoard things, who have an intense or selfish desire thinks you are greedy, it'll be much harder for them to get into heaven than it would be for a camel to get through the eye of a needle.

If you've ever seen a needle, the tiny, tiny hole, such as idea of a metaphor but it's very difficult for those people who are greedy, who hoard things, and don't distribute that fairly, will not get the same rewards of heaven as others.

And in Islam, it says "Competition in worldly increase "diverts you until you visit the graveyards." As she was saying here, diverting you away from the true things that you should be doing in life such as following the Quranic teachings.

Islam has this very strong emphasis on Zakah, this yearly expectation to give 2.

5% of your either wealth to charity to help distribute wealth, because Islam recognises that wealth does not belong to you as an individual, that everything ultimately belongs to Allah and therefore, it should be distributed fairly and making sure that everyone is able to live without, you know, needing to go without necessities.

So both Christianity and Islam say that greed should not be a reason for crime.

There's no excuse for committing a crime out of greed.

What I would like you to do then please is to answer the following question, spend about three minutes on this.

What do both Christians and Muslims believe about those who commit a crime because of greed? So you're going to pause the video, spend about three minutes on this, write your answer unpause when you're ready to look through the answer with me.

Okay, so answer.

Both Christianity and Islam teach that greed is bad and both religions encourage giving.

Crimes committed out of greed are still wrong and a person who commits a crime out of greed is still guilty.

What I'd like you to do if you need to make any corrections here is to pause the video and then write down your corrections and then unpause when you're ready and we will look at the idea of hatred as a reason for crime.

In.

There we go.

So, hatred may also be seen as a reason for crime.

But we'll have a look at Christians and Muslims say about whether someone is still guilty if they've committed a crime out of hatred.

So hatred is a very negative emotion that can often lead to violence.

This idea that you might hate something so much that you might be violent towards it.

And some crimes may be committed out of hatred, such as revenge or retaliation.

Now, both Christianity and Islam would teach against the idea of hatred, and would both not accept that as a reason for crime and believe that someone who commits a crime out of hatred would still be guilty.

Now in Christianity, there's a very strong teaching, which talks about the fact that hatred is not the way to go and not the way to react to things and that is "Love your neighbour as you love yourself." Now, I see this quote used so much in Christianity, and it's a good quotation to use.

Jesus teaches to love your neighbour as you love yourself, his idea of everyone is your neighbour and you should be treating them with love and care.

What I don't like about when people use love thy neighbour is we don't go into the real nitty gritty of exactly the type of love that Jesus is teaching in this teaching, and that is what we call agape love.

This is a Greek word agape, and refers to self-sacrificial, unconditional love.

What that means is you should be willing to do anything for anyone unconditionally.

It doesn't matter whether you know them doesn't matter whether you don't like them, that everyone is your neighbour and everyone deserves to be treated in the same way.

It's the same love which Christians believe God shows to humanity by sacrificing Jesus on the cross for sins.

So whenever you talk about love thy neighbour in, Christianity, and if you use it in exam question, yes, it's fine to use love your neighbour, but it's really important that we understand and explain just a sort of love that Jesus is teaching 'cause that actually then enhances this idea that Christianity would say it's not okay to commit a crime out of hatred, because that is not showing agape love.

You are treating people differently, and you're putting conditions on when you are nice to someone or when you're not.

Agape love you should be says, you should love everyone unconditionally, no matter who they are, whether you know them, whether they're someone close by or far away.

And then Islam it says, "And do good, "indeed Allah loves the doers of good." Essentially, hatred does not get you closer to God, when you should be following the examples of the Qur'an of the prophets, then you should be doing good things and hatred is not a good action.

So both Christianity and Islam would say someone who commits a crime out of hatred is still guilty.

So what I'd like you to do is to answer this question 'cause I really want us to bring out this importance of love thy neighbour and which type of love it's talking about.

So what is agape and how does this link to Christian views on crimes committed out of hatred? Want you pause the video and spend about three minutes answering this question, unpause when you're ready to go through the answer with me.

Okay, you ready for the answer.

So, this is the answer.

Agape is self-sacrificial, unconditional love.

Christians believe you should love people regardless of who they are, so committing a crime of hatred is wrong.

And if you need to make a correction, can you please make sure you pause the video now, make any corrections and we'll move on to looking at opposition to unjust laws.

Okay, brilliant.

Let's look at the last then reason for crime that we'll be looking at in this lesson today.

This is opposition to unjust laws.

So within history, or even now today, there may be some governments that may be seen as unjust.

So for example, they're treating people unfairly perhaps they have laws, which aren't fair which treat people differently.

For example, it's a really common example used but it's a really good way of showing how sometimes the government can have unjust laws is perhaps the ways that the Jews were treated during Nazi Germany's regime in which they were not allowed to do certain things as other members of the community at the time.

And so, there are many instances where someone might say, I'm going to break the law because I don't feel it's right to carry on following that law.

Or I want to show that I oppose this law.

And so in Christianity, we have seen this example with Martin Luther King Jr.

in the African American civil rights movement in around the 1960s.

Which is where African Americans, black Americans were treated differently.

So the maybe weren't allowed to sit in the same sections on a bus.

They weren't allowed in certain restaurants.

They had to be served differently.

They didn't have access same jobs, at one point they weren't allowed to vote.

So lots of different ways in which they were treated unfairly.

And Martin Luther King, as a Christian pastor, actually opposed these laws and stood up against them.

And many Christians will say actually where something is unfair, they may allow you to oppose an unjust law and to break that law if you believe it's morally incorrect.

In Islam, they may have a similar idea unless it's to do with Shari'ah law.

So in Islam, they believe that Shari'ah law comes from Allah.

And if anything comes from Allah, as Allah cannot make mistakes, then it can never be wrong.

So Muslims would say that Shari'ah law can never be unjust as it's directly from Allah, who cannot make mistakes.

What we're going to do now, is a couple of quick five questions just to test how well we have understood what we've just gone through.

So both Christians and Muslims believe it is acceptable to oppose an unjust law.

Is that true or false? Three, two, one.

True, both Christians and Muslims may believe it's acceptable to impose an unjust law where people are not being treated fairly.

Martin Luther King is an example of a Muslim who opposed unjust laws.

Is that true or false? Three, two, one.

That's false.

Martin Luther King is an example of a Christian who opposed unjust law.

Muslims believe Shari'ah law can never be unjust.

Is that true or false? Three, two, one.

Good, that is true, because it comes directly from God, it cannot be unjust.

Now what we're going to do is, put all of this together, all of these reasons for crime and the Christian Muslim views together, so that we've got this written down really nice and clearly what the Christians, what the Muslims believe about each of these reasons for crime.

So on the next slide, I'm going to ask you to pause so that I can give you instructions on how to complete our task.

So here you can see that I've got a table.

I've got on the left hand side the reasons for crime, poverty, upbringing, mental illness, addiction, greed, hatred and opposition to unjust law.

And across the top I've got the two religions Christianity and Islam.

I want you to add into your table, what would Christianity and Islam believe about crimes committed for these reasons.

You can see I've given you poverty as an example.

And for Christianity and Islam, I said that in Christianity stealing is wrong, but God may not see it as stealing if someone is in poverty.

And then in Islam stealing is wrong, but those who steal because of poverty will not be punished.

So what I like to do is to copy out the table, you may want to just write it as notes instead, if that's how you'd like to do, is absolutely fine.

The content is the most important part.

And I want you to complete the table for each of those other reasons for crime.

If you need to go back in the video by rewinding, then feel free to do that if it's going to help you fill in your table, but we will go through corrections together and make sure that we've got everything done as we should do.

So please pause the video now and get started on that for me.

Okay, if you can see this slide, I'm assuming that you are ready for corrections.

If you're not quite ready, then rewind a little bit and carry on with your table.

If you are ready, then please make sure you've got different coloured pen out ready for corrections.

And we'll go through all of the answers.

So I've got up here poverty, upbringing, mental illness, because I want to make sure we can fit it all in and I'll give you the next slide in a moment.

So we did poverty together already.

Upbringing, for Christianity, parents ought to set a good example, but as a child grows up they become responsible for their actions.

And in Islam, Ibrahim is an example of someone who left behind the ways of their family.

Which again shows with this idea of upbringing that people are therefore then responsible for their actions, the more they grew up, and therefore they cannot necessarily blame their actions on their bad upbringing.

For mental illness, for both Christianity and Islam.

If someone does not understand the law, they are not guilty of committing a crime.

So you're going to pause the video please and make corrections if you need to.

Then we'll move on to the next set of answers.

Okay, and the last set of questions for your table.

Addiction both Christianity and Islam would say those who commit a crime because of addiction are still guilty, but should receive help for their addiction.

Both Christianity and Islam are say for agreed that crimes committed because of greed are wrong because both religions teach about giving.

Hatred for both Christianity and Islam will say the crimes committed out of hatred or wrong.

Both religions teach about treating people fairly.

And with opposition to unjust law, Christianity would say some laws are unjust and should be opposed.

Martin Luther King is an example of this.

And in Islam, some laws are unjust and should be opposed, but Shari'ah law can never be unjust or should not be opposed.

If you need to make any corrections, can you please make sure you do that.

So now by pausing the video, unpause when you are ready to move on.

When we'll start looking at non-religious views on reasons for crime.

There are lots of different non-religious views.

Just as though we would say that Christians and Muslims all won't agree on the same issue.

The same with non-religious people.

They might identify as secular, atheist, agnostic, they might follow certain ethical theories like utilitarians.

And therefore not all non-religious people would agree on exactly the same issues.

We're going to specifically look at utilitarianism as a response to reasons for crime.

Utilitarianism is the ethical theory that says the good action is an action which produces the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people.

And so, even within utilitarianism, we might say that there are different views on whether or not a reason for crime is an acceptable reason for crime.

You might say, for example, that those who follow utilitarianism would say that someone is not guilty of committing a crime, if they are suffering from a mental illness, as this comes with the understanding that they should be helped, which will produce more happiness for more people, if that person could be helped with their mental illness than punishing them.

We might say that somebody who perhaps steals out of poverty should not be punished in the same way as someone who steals for not because of poverty, and it produces the greatest happiness to help that person rather than punishing them for their crime.

And those who are non-religious, who follow utilitarianism, they say it produces the greatest happiness to the greatest number to punish somebody who was committing a crime out of hatred or greed.

But it's likely that person is not thinking about, you know, the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people in the community.

A person who commits a crime out of greed or out of hatred, actually should be punished for their actions.

So as again, I would say there's a lot of different views within the non-religious community, on reasons for crime and just in general, which means that we can't necessarily say all non-religious people were saying this about reasons for crime, but we can use utilitarianism as a way of explaining how some people might approach these different reasons for crime.

So I'd like you to do for me please is to answer the following questions, spend about three minutes on it.

Will all non-religious people agree on the response to different reasons for crime? Explain your answer.

So you going to pause the video have a go at writing an answer, then unpause when you're ready to go through the answer with me.

Okay, here's my answer.

So the answer's no, there are a range of different non-religious views.

This will be based on a lot of different influences.

But there may be some consensus you might see, an agreement between non-religious people, that hatred is should not be a reason for crime that there's no leniency when someone commits a crime out of hatred, that they're still guilty of committing a crime.

Well done, if you've got something like that.

It is important, of course, to recognise that there are differences, but also really important to recognise there will be a large consensus between non-religious people.

So I want to say a huge thank you for working so hard in the lesson today.

We've covered a couple of sensitive topics.

We've covered a lot of material, and we also considered a lot of different viewpoints today.

So well done for keeping up, well done for working hard as always, I really hope I see you again soon for a another lesson.

Next lesson is lesson three of 14, we'll be looking at Shari'ah law within Islam.

So thank you very much.

See you later.