Lesson video

Hi, my name is Miss Speakman.

We're on lesson 12 of 14 of the crime and punishment unit.

And in today's lesson, we'll be looking at revision of the unit.

So we're going to recap the key content explored in the unit, but this will not cover everything in the unit.

We're not going to go through the whole unit in our lesson today, cause that would be a huge lesson, wouldn't it? If we've done, 11 lessons of content each, you know, we should be spending about an hour on terms of work.

That's 11 hours, I don't want to do a video lesson for 11 hours, and I'm assuming that you don't want to spend 11 hours going over everything again.

So the idea is that we'll recap some of the key material, and then of course, that will leave some gaps of things that you may need to go over yourself.

That's always the case with revision though, that you should always have your own revision alongside any revision you do with your teacher or in here when we're looking at these lessons.

So let's get ourselves ready for our lesson first of all.

So we're going to need a pen or a pencil, a piece of paper, an exercise book and a different colour pen for corrections.

And you need to make sure that you've got a nice, clear working space.

So you've got TV, music off, phone to one side if you're not using it for the lesson and a nice, clear, quiet working space.

If you need to get yourself set up at all, then please pause the video now and unpause when you're ready to start revising.

Okay, brilliant.

Let's move on.

So the first thing is I'm going to actually just talk about why we don't cover everything in one lesson, because we might think, "Well, surely we can get it all "over and done with revision, boom, done.

"We're ready." That's not really how it works.

And it's little bit more complicated than that.

And you need to make sure you put a lot of effort into revision.

It's just as important as learning the material in the first place, because it's very likely that we will forgotten a lot of the stuff, even if we've tried our best to remember it.

And this is all to do what we call this idea of cognitive load.

We all have a short term memory and long term memory.

Our short term memory can only deal with a couple of new things at a time.

And then afterwards it forgets things.

So short term memory is obviously short term.

The long term memory is said to be infinite.

So essentially if we can get things into our long term memory, the idea is that we can fit as much stuff in our long term memory as we'd like to.

And that needs to be done with a particular type of learning, revision, et cetera.

It's almost impossible for you to remember every single thing that you've ever done that go straight into long term memory.

You've got to work to make it get in there.

You have to build what we call schemas, which is sort of like filing cabinets inside your long term memory where you keep stuff in.

So you'd be like, "Oh, I'm going to open up my Islam schema." And you open it up and then inside you've got, "Oh, I know what they believe about Shari'ah law.

"I know what they believe about Tawhid, et cetera." All of those things are stored away in your long term memory.

That takes practise.

And that takes deliberate practise.

That's going over things quite a few times.

Making an effort to memorise things, testing yourself, but doing that over a prolonged period of time, not just doing it once and then never going back to it.

So the idea of revision is so important in that type of way of building schemas.

So it will help then to reduce this idea of cognitive load.

You may sort of think about it when you know lyrics to a song really, really well it's because you've listened to it loads and loads of times, it's in your long term memory.

And perhaps even years later, when you listen to a song that you haven't listened to in years, you might remember a large amount of that song lyric, just because you know it so well, it's in your long term memory.

You've probably experienced that.

I've experienced that when I listened to some of the old Justin Bieber music and I was like, "I still know all the words, that's really embarrassing," but also at the same time, that shows me that my brain is amazing.

That it can remember all of these sorts of things.

Luckily as well for me, can also remember a huge amount of Ari, because I've gone over it so many times.

And essentially that's why teachers are able to teach you guys about all of this stuff.

Because it's all in their long term memory.

They've built up that knowledge over time.

And they're able then to explain it.

The best way of testing whether you know something really well, is whether you can teach somebody else.

So other topics will be covered in other lessons.

So as much as possible, I will also try to cover these little bits we've missed in the exam question practise lesson, and also the deliberate practise lesson, which is to do with learning quotations, keywords, et cetera.

But it will also be the case that you will need to revise other things that we've missed in your own time, with your teacher or by yourself.

So let's get started.

What were we going to cover today then? So what actually things we are going to cover, so you might say, "Well, Miss Speakman, "you've spent a long time talking, "but you haven't told us what we're doing today." So we're going to cover Christian and Islamic attitudes towards lawbreakers, types of crime and attitudes to the treatment of criminals.

So essentially we're going to talk about the types of crime that the unit covers and the attitudes to how you punish a criminal, but also general attitudes in Christianity and Islam towards people who break the law.

We're going to start off with, I'm going to pause and I'm going to ask you a question.

In order to do that I'm going to disappear.

So I'd like you to answer the following questions spending about four minutes on this.

What are the two main responses in Christianity to those who break the law? One of them links to retribution and one of them links to reformation.

So like you to pause the video please, spend about four minutes on this, unpause when you're ready for the answers.

Okay, ready? The answer is going to pop up at the same time as me.

So the answer is: well some Christians believe the punishment should be as severe as the crime committed, which links this idea of retribution, that the punishment should match the severity of the crime.

And some believe you should hate the crime, not the criminal and help them to change their behaviour, which is the idea of reformation.

So there are two main thoughts within Christianity.

One is more to do with the idea of retribution saying, "Well, you've committed this crime "the punishment should match that in severity." Which is the idea of retribution, this idea of payback.

Whereas some Christians believe you should hate the crime, not the criminal and say, "Well, actually you should recognise "that the person itself is not evil, "but they have done something wrong "and they need help learning why that action was wrong "and help them to change their behaviour." Well done if you've got that correct.

It's okay if you didn't, the idea of revision, it should help highlight some things that you do know and some things you don't know.

So it's more than fine at this stage to still be going, "Oh, that was a little bit tricky." Because then it's really good way of saying, "Okay, I found that tricky.

"That'll be something I go back too, "perhaps maybe I re-watch the lesson on this topic." Or perhaps maybe you haven't watched my lesson on this topic.

You might think, that will be helpful to go back to that.

Or perhaps maybe ask your teacher, look in textbooks, et cetera.

All those sorts of things is a really good way of just highlighting to us, Okay, that'll be something to go over.

And that's absolutely fine.

If you need to make any corrections for this, please pause the video now and do so, and then unpause when you're ready to move on to the next section.

So recapping some ideas on Christianity and law breakers.

Now, in Christianity the Christians are generally against people breaking the law.

So the law is there to protect people, to keep order in society.

And that the idea is that the people in authority have been put there by God, there's a specific quotation which refers to the idea that you should obey the state authorities because the authorities have been put there by God.

And of course, God is to be trusted.

Of course, though there may be some instances where Christians say that law is unjust.

People are being treated unfairly and therefore some Christians may say, it's possible to break an unjust law if it's done to try and protect people or to sort essentially solve those injustices.

But generally Christians say that you shouldn't be breaking the law because the law is there to protect people, to keep order to society.

There's two main responses to those who break the law.

Of course, it's the idea that the punishment should be as severe as the crime committed, this idea of retribution.

Whereas some believe that it's the idea of reformation, you should hate the crime, not to the criminal.

This idea of changing their behaviour, because many Christians may say, "Actually, retribution doesn't really help "with changing that person's behaviour "and if we want an ordered society "and if we want to fit with the teachings of Jesus, "which say to love your neighbour, "then the most loving thing is to help that person "with whatever they're struggling with "which has caused them to commit that crime." In Christianity many believe there is a duty to forgive.

Not just an idea that it'd be nice if they forgave, but a duty to forgive.

This comes back to the idea of Jesus dying on the cross for human sins.

Christians believe that God was willing to forgive the sins of humanity, which are.

I mean let's just put it this way.

All of us will do bad things in our lives.

That is just the way it is.

Christians say this is a result of original sin.

This idea that people are inherently sinful and will do bad things.

And then think about how many people there are on the world currently, How many people that are, or have been in the world and how many there will be in the future.

It's a huge number! And Christians say, if God was willing to forgive all of that, then we should be willing to forgive any person when they commit a crime.

So many Christians say, "Well, there's a duty to forgive." If God's willing to forgive and he's willing to forgive limitless times then Christians should try and emulate that in their lives too.

We have Islam then, again, Muslims would generally be against people breaking the law specifically within Shari'ah law countries.

So countries that are based on Islamic law, they would say, "You shouldn't be breaking the law." In non Shari'ah countries, again, Muslims say you should generally be against people breaking the law.

Because again, the idea is that laws are there to protect people, to order society, but also that they should be respectful of the country's laws that they are living in if they're not living in Islamic law country.

Many Muslims would say that punishment is an expression of justice.

This idea of retribution deterrence is more of a main aim within Islam than it is within Christianity.

This idea that punishment should match the severity of the crime.

And it is a way for the victim or the victim's family to get a sense of justice, to feel like they have payback back for whatever has been done to them.

Muslims believe that Shari'ah law can never be unjust.

This is because it's from Allah.

This idea that Allah can never make mistakes.

He is just, and therefore anything he puts down as law is just.

So, a Muslim would say, "It's never unjust to follow Shari'ah law." And while in Christianity, forgiveness can be seen as a duty, in Islam forgiveness is encouraged, but not a duty.

It is part of some of the punishments for forgivable crimes, such as murder.

So for example, the punishment for murder in Shari'ah law can be up to execution.

But also the victim's family can choose to forgive the criminal and they could have 'blood money' as compensation, or they could have the person sentenced to life in prison.

So forgiveness is encouraged.

And some Muslims would go as far to say, "You should be trying to forgive as much possible "because Allah is merciful." But many Muslims would say, "Look, Allah is merciful, it's down to him to forgive, "not down to humans." So, we're now just going to go through one question.

I think it's a fairly straightforward question, but it's always good to check.

That question is: What is the name of Islamic law? I've mentioned it a couple of times already in the lesson today.

So we'll spend about a minute on this.

Write it down.

What is the name of Islamic law? Pause now, unpause when you're ready.

Okay, have you written it down? Have you written down Shari'ah law? Well done if you have, that's brilliant if you have.

I did say it a couple of times, but it's always good to check.

Some of those things are super, super key.

If you can drop in your exam questions that Muslims believe in Shari'ah law, it's never unjust, et cetera.

That just looks really, really good in your exam questions you know what you're talking about.

You don't just say, "Islamic law," using the terms shows a really good knowledge of Islam.

So what we're now going to move on to is some longer questions I want to sort of bring everything together so far and then we'll keep on with our revision.

We'll keep going.

And then hopefully by the end of the lesson, you feel like you've picked up on some things that you need to go back over and also perhaps maybe being a bit more confident like, "I actually do know quite a lot of stuff." So I'm going to disappear.

We're going to do some questions.

I'd like you to pause the video on the next slide, please, to complete your task.

I'm going to give you instructions when you're on the next slide.

So what I'd like you to do is to answer the following questions.

Some of them are true or false, and some of them are just questions.

Do Christians and Muslims generally respect the law? Explain.

What are the two contrasting attitudes within Christianity towards lawbreakers? Christians believe the main aim of punishment should be retribution.

True or false because.

Muslims believe that the main aim of punishment should be retribution.

True or false because.

In Islam forgiveness is a duty.

True or false because.

And tell me why, in Christianity forgiveness is a duty.

True or false because.

What I'd like you to do please is to write out the question and then write out the answer.

So pause now please, uspause when you're ready to go through corrections.

Okay if you can see this screen, then please make sure that you've got a different coloured pen out ready for corrections.

If you're not quite finished then you can rewind the video and then carry on with your questions, then come back to us when you're ready for the answers.

So different coloured pen out at the ready please.

So for the first three: Do Christians and Muslims generally respect the law? Yes, Christians and Muslims believe that the laws maintain order in society and protects citizens and for this reason they should be obeyed.

What are the two contrasting attitudes within Christianity towards lawbreakers? Some believe a punishment should be as severe as the crime committed, so it will put the criminal off reoffending.

Some believe it is important to hate the crime, not the person who committed it and therefore help the offender so they do not reoffend.

Christians believe that the main aim of punishment should be retribution.

Is false because Christians believe that reform is the main aim of punishment.

This is because at the heart of Christianity is the idea of forgiveness.

This doesn't mean there should be no punishment at all for crimes, though.

If you need to make any corrections, please pause and do that now.

And then we'll move onto the next three answers.

Muslims believe that the main aim of punishment should be retribution is true because it should pay back the one who suffers as a result of the crime.

In Islam forgiveness is a duty, is false because forgiveness is strongly recommended or encouraged.

In Christianity forgiveness is a duty is true because God is willing to forgive people for sins, so Christians should be willing to do the same.

Again, if you need to make any corrections, please do so now and then unpause when you are ready to move on and we'll start looking at the different types of crime.

Next, I'm going to ask you a question.

I want you to spend three minutes on this question.

What are the three types of crime we have looked at in this unit? What I mean by this is the types of crime that specifically you should be looking at to see what Christians and Muslims believe about that type of crime.

So pause the video please.

See if you can write down the three types of crime we've looked at and then unpause when you are ready.

Okay, you've written down an answer? Hopefully, you have put down, hate crime, theft and murder.

It's okay if you didn't get all three, that's absolutely fine if you didn't.

We're going to go through all of those beliefs now what do Christians and Muslims believe about it? So don't worry if you didn't get it, but well done if you did.

So, first we're going to look at Christianity, hate crime, theft and murder in terms of what do they think about these three types of crime.

Now with the idea of hate crime, this is where perhaps, maybe someone is aggressive or violent towards someone because of their race, religion, gender, sexuality, all of those different ideas are the idea of hate crime.

So you're treating someone differently or even being violent towards somebody just because they are different to you.

Now, Christians would it be against all forms of hate crime.

They believe it's never okay to treat someone differently because of who they are.

And this comes from the idea of "love your neighbour," which is a teaching from Jesus.

This links very nicely to this idea of 'agape love.

' What I have said before in these videos, but if you don't know, my students know how much I dislike them using, "love thy neighbour," or 'love your neighbour' without talking about agape love.

I say to them, "Everyone uses, "love your neighbour" "because it's a really easy one to remember "and you can say, it's not loving "to be mean to people, et cetera." But it sounds so much better if you can explain it with the term of 'agape.

' So by all means, of course, use "love for your neighbour." It is a verse which Jesus taught in the Bible and therefore many Christians would follow this teaching, but use it properly.

Use it in the way that really explains for Christians, why it's important to follow this.

And also why that means they're definitely against hate crimes.

So, "love your neighbour," this idea of agape, agape is a Greek term for self-sacrificial unconditional love.

For Christians they believe it's the sort of love that God shows to human beings because he sacrificed Jesus on the cross to save sins.

So what we mean by this is, agape love means you shouldn't be treating anyone differently because of who they are, whether you know them or not, whether they're far or near, you should be treating everybody with the same love and the same respect.

And therefore that shows that hate crime is wrong because it's not showing agape love to treat somebody differently because of their race, religion, gender, sexuality, et cetera.

And therefore for theft, we're going to talk about this idea of the golden rule.

Now you might hear of this before, the idea of, do to others what you want done to you, The direct verse we can use is: "do for others just what you want them to do for you." Now we can probably say in this case, but for many Christians, it would be, "Well don't steal because you wouldn't want "someone to steal from you." It's the idea of the golden rule isn't it? This idea of do for others as you want them to do for you.

You wouldn't want people stealing from you so you shouldn't steal either.

But we could also talk about within Christianity, the idea that God wouldn't want somebody to be going without.

So Christians would say, "God doesn't want people to be living in poverty, "to be struggling, et cetera." So some Christians may say, "If someone steals out of poverty, "then it might not be considered theft," and therefore not guilty of committing a crime.

So some Christians would be more accepting of people stealing if it was to save the life of somebody else, if they were in dire need of food or something like that, or money.

So generally, theft, Christians would be against, because this idea it's wrong because you don't want someone to do that to you.

It specifically says in the Ten Commandments don't steal, but also as well, cause we wouldn't want that to be done to us.

And then for murder, which is the idea of deliberately killing somebody, is wrong in Christianity.

In Exodus, in the Ten Commandments, it says, "Do not commit murder." It's very clear that murder is wrong.

It's important of course, to distinguish between murder and killing.

Killing is the idea, sometimes it may be justifiable.

So perhaps maybe in self defence, perhaps maybe in war, people aren't in those cases, usually, found guilty of a crime, when that happens.

Or if they are it's manslaughter rather than murder.

But in this case, "do not commit murder," is really clear, you should not be murdering people.

It is completely wrong, but you can also link this to the idea of sanctity of life, all life is sacred and should be protected at all costs.

But so, generally hate crime, always wrong.

For the majority of Christians, theft, most Christians would say is wrong.

Unless of course it's someone who is need through poverty.

Murder, always wrong for most Christians.

So let's then look at.

Oh let me disappear.

Summarising this information then.

So, I want you to spend about four minutes on this.

You may have to take a little bit longer depending on how much detail you're going to go into.

I want you to summarise Christians views, please, on hate crime theft and murder.

So just generally tell me what would a Christian say about hate crime and theft and murder.

So pause the video now, please and then unpause when you're ready to go through the corrections.

So here's my answer.

I fit it all in one paragraph.

You may have separated it, which is fine.

Christianity is against hate crime, theft and murder.

Christianity is against all of these crimes for similar reasons.

The teachings of the Bible appear to be against these crimes.

Christians are encouraged to love their neighbour, not hate them.

Christians are taught to treat others as they like would like to be treated and it is normal to not want to be the victim of theft.

However, Christians may say those who steal out of poverty are not guilty of a crime.

Finally, the Ten Commandments specifically rule out murder.

So, you might not have written it word for word like mine.

That's absolutely fine, I'm not expecting you to, but there are some key things in there aren't there? So if you need to add anything or you need to correct anything, please pause the video now then unpause and we'll be ready to move on to looking Islam's view on these types of crime.

So I'm just going to put my screen back up.

So, for hate crime, theft or murder within Islam, we have hate crime, where it says, "indeed Allah orders justice, and good conduct, "and giving to relatives and forbids immortality "and bad conduct and oppression." Essentially Muslims would say that hate crime is an example of immorality, bad conduct and oppression.

You're treating somebody differently because of who they are, which is unjust.

It's immoral to do so and it oppresses somebody.

Hate crime usually means that that person is physically or emotionally harmed.

And therefore that is oppressing them from going about their normal life.

So Muslims would be generally against hate crime because of this.

And they don't believe that it will get people into Jannah, which is paradise.

As for theft in Islam, there are clear ideas within Islam, especially within Shari'ah law, that theft is always wrong.

It is seen as an unforgivable crime within Islam, which means that only Allah can forgive it, not humans.

You can be punished on earth and there is a set punishment for theft, but only Allah can forgive it because it's seen as a crime against Allah.

So in the Qur'an it says, "As for the thief, "the male and the female, amputate their hands "in recompense for what they committed "as a deterrent a punishment from Allah." Now, what this means is within Shari'ah law, the set punishment for theft is the amputation of the hand.

In order for this to happen, you need a high level of evidence.

So I think correct me if I'm wrong somebody, two male witnesses to the act taking place.

But also other things are taken into account too.

So for example, the value of the item, the intention of the person taking it, where the item was kept, the age of the person taking it, all these and other things will take into account before someone is convicted and found guilty of theft to then have their hand amputated.

But essentially in Islam, theft is wrong.

Some Muslims may say, it's okay if someone is in poverty.

And this may be taken into account, especially with all of these conditions within Shari'ah law, but would generally be against theft.

And then murder.

Muslims would also be against murder completely.

And the Qur'an says, "whoever kills a soul "it is as if he had slain mankind entirely." There's sort of two ways we can interpret this.

Many people would say, it's very serious.

If you kill one person, it's as serious as killing the whole of mankind.

And there is another main interpretation is that when you murder somebody, when you kill somebody, you are taking away the possibility of that person having children and ancestors, et cetera, which of course affects the whole of mankind.

So Muslims would believe that every person is created by Allah, is therefore special and that we don't have the right to take life.

So Muslims would be against murder.

So I'm going to disappear again.

Cause I'm going to get you to summarise Islamic views on hate crime, theft and murder.

I want you to answer the following questions, spend up four minutes on this.

I want you to summarise Islamic views on hate crime, theft and murder.

You can do them separately.

Or you can do them in one paragraph like I did before with Christianity, up to you.

Pause the video now, unpause when you're ready to go through the answers.

Okay here's my answer.

Islam is against hate crime, theft and murder.

Islam is against all of these crimes, as the Qur'an teaches against them.

It's not considered justice to treat someone differently out of hatred.

Theft is an unforgivable crime and carries the penalty of amputation at the hand.

And murder is considered a destruction of Allah's creation and a disrespectful threat to all of humanity.

If you need to make any corrections, remember you don't need to have it word for word like mine, but you do need the key points then pause the video now please, and make those corrections.

And then we'll be ready to move on to different types of punishment.

Looking now then at Christian views on types of punishment, specifically focusing on prison, corporal punishment and community service.

Now you'll see there I've got ticks and crosses for generally what Christians believe about these types of punishment.

I'm pretty impressed.

I said this, I think before in my other lesson.

I did the tick myself.

It's not pop-art, so I'm pretty impressed by that.

Anyway, looking at prison, first of all, the majority of Christians say that prison is an effective method of punishment, which essentially punishes that criminal, but doesn't treat them inhumanely and it's a chance for reform to come with it.

So many Christians say that prison is enough of a deterrent to not use other punishments, such as corporal punishment or capital punishment which is the death penalty.

So many Christians say that prison is an effective way of punishing a criminal.

That it takes away some of their freedom.

It essentially means that they are matched with the severity of their crime committed.

So for example, they spend longer in prison for more serious crimes.

But there's also, they believe, an opportunity then to reform the criminal alongside that punishment.

So Christians would say that in prison, it would be a good idea for that person to receive an education, to receive counselling, to perhaps maybe even meet with the victim or victim's family of their crimes.

So they can understand what they have done, the pain that they've caused and an opportunity then for once they've been released from prison to perhaps maybe hopefully not reoffend again and be able to contribute positively to society.

As for corporal punishment, while Christians believe it is important to punish someone for the crime they committed, they don't necessarily agree with the use of harsh punishments like physical punishment as they believe it doesn't really work in terms of reforming a criminal and is not treating that person with dignity.

Some Christians may say that it is a good way of discipline, but many Christians would say that prison is enough to cover this idea of retribution.

And also corporal punishment doesn't allow that chance to reform.

Community service.

Majority of Christians would believe is an effective way to deal with less serious crimes and a good way to deal with those crimes which harm the community or harm the environment.

So things like vandalism.

So community service allows that person to give back to the community.

Something like cleaning the streets, picking up litter, unpaid work, which seems that enough of a deterrence cause in some ways it's like a high visibility vest.

But also because Christians believe it comes to this idea of reform too.

Many people who take part in community service will also have counselling alongside it.

They'll go to groups to help them understand why what they did was wrong, et cetera.

So on the whole, Christians do believe that community service is an effective way of dealing with less serious crimes.

I'm going to disappear again.

I'm going to get you to summarise the views in Christianity on prison and corporal punishment and community service.

So what I'd like you to do please, is to answer the following question, spend about four minutes on this.

I want you to summarise Christian views on prison, corporal punishment and community service.

When you are done, then you unpause the video and we'll go through the corrections.

Okay so here's my answer.

Many Christians believe that prison can be used for serious offences, however, they will strongly argue that prisoners ought to be supported in prison and helped to reform.

With corporal punishment, imposing physical pain on people is completely unacceptable for most Christians.

Although Christians agree with discipline, any discipline should follow the example of Jesus' teachings to "love your neighbour as you love yourself." Many Christians largely agree that community service is an acceptable form of punishment for minor offences, but there should be programmes alongside it to help reform.

Again, it doesn't need to be word for word like mine, but the key things need to be in there.

So if you want to, or you need to please pause the video make corrections, and then unpause when you're ready to move on.

Looking at Islamic views now on these types of punishment.

And you see, again, my ticks and my crosses sort of give you the general views within Islam.

With prison, it's slightly different to what Christians believe.

So they still believe that prison is good for serious crimes, but that this is more to do with justifiable retribution and deterrence than it is to do with reform.

For many Muslims, this idea of going to prison, and having your freedom taken away, et cetera, is a way of removing that criminal from society and protecting society.

And also idea that there's a sense of justice.

They've been given a lengthy prison sentence to match the severity of the crime they've committed.

For many Muslims the idea of forgiveness alongside punishment doesn't quite work.

This idea that punishment should be a punishment and forgiveness can go with it if you want, but it shouldn't be alongside like, whereas for Christians this idea of reform while someone's in prison is an important aspect for them.

Corporal punishment Muslims believe can be an effective deterrent and a form of retribution.

In Shari'ah law there are specific teachings on corporal punishment, such as the amputation of the hand for theft, flogging for certain crimes, which is the idea of whipping.

And that is that for Muslims seen as an effective deterrent against those crimes.

As for community service, many Muslims would believe it's too soft a punishment and not enough of a deterrent to stop people from committing crimes.

So it's not particularly used within Shari'ah law and many Muslims would say, it's not really that effective.

So again, I'm going to ask you to then summarise these views.

I'm going to disappear for this.

So I'd like you to answer the following question, spend about four minutes on this.

Summarise Islamic views on prison, corporal punishment and community service.

So I want you to pause video now please, unpause when you're ready to go through corrections.

Okay here's my example.

Many Muslims agree with the use of prisons, but Shari'ah law explains that they aren't really about reform.

They are used to hold an offender who is awaiting trial or punishment.

Corporal punishment is accepted in Islamic countries, Shari'ah law for a number offences like gambling, drinking, or selling alcohol.

This is seen as an effective deterrent.

Shari'ah law doesn't use community service very often.

This is because it's not believed that it offers a strong enough deterrent to protect society.

And so many Muslims would not believe it to be an effective punishment.

Again, you don't need to have it word for word like me, but if you do need to make any corrections for the key points then please pause now, then unpause when you are ready.

So I want to say a huge, huge, thank you for your hard work today.

We revised quite a lot, I think.

And we've gone over quite a lot and you've rewritten quite a lot.

So well, well, well done for doing that and for working so hard.

Give yourself a pat on the back.

So I want to say again, huge thank you.

But also just reiterate that revision is super, super important.

We haven't covered everything in our lesson today, so you will have to go over quite a few of the different topics that we haven't covered, such as forgiveness, the death penalty, attitudes to the idea of suffering.

Which we will cover in some of their lessons like exam, practise, and deliberate practise lesson.

However, again, that needs to be something you do in your own time as well, to make sure that you know everything really, really well.

And it's all your longterm memory ready for your exam, which will of course be coming up at some point.

So again, a big, thank you.

I hope to see you again for some of our other lessons.

Thank you so much.

Goodbye.