Analysing and comparing language techniques in non-fiction writing
I can analyse and compare the use of adjectives, listing and onomatopoeia for effect in non-fiction texts.
Analysing and comparing language techniques in non-fiction writing
I can analyse and compare the use of adjectives, listing and onomatopoeia for effect in non-fiction texts.
Lesson details
Key learning points
- Analysing methods helps us to consider the effect the writer is trying to have on the reader.
- Comparing the methods used helps us understand the writers' craft and how it relates to meaning.
- Both Dickens and Day use "crammed"; however Day uses juxtaposition to lessen the chaotic atmosphere.
- Dickens enhances the overwhelming atmosphere through listing and onomatopoeia.
- Day creates a calmer atmosphere by avoiding the use of listing and onomatopoeia.
Common misconception
You can only compare methods that both writers use when comparing non-fiction texts.
It can be very effective to compare why one writer might choose to use a certain method while another writer may choose not to use it.
Keywords
Juxtaposition - the fact of two things being seen or placed close together with contrasting effect
Overwhelmed - to overpower the thoughts, emotions or senses
Semantic field - a group of words or phrases with a related meaning
Onomatopoeia - words that imitate the natural sound associated with their meaning
Cacophonous - having an unpleasant mixture of sounds
Equipment
You will need a copy of Dickens' 'Greenwich Fair' and Day's 'Are we having fun yet?'. There are copies available in the additional materials.
Licence
This content is © Oak National Academy Limited (2024), licensed on Open Government Licence version 3.0 except where otherwise stated. See Oak's terms & conditions (Collection 2).
Video
Loading...